Investments

Click Fraud, an Industry Crisis, or Blip on the Search Engine Marketing Landscape?

New York, NY (PRWeb) February 23, 2005 -- The Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization (SEMPO) today weighed in on the subject of click fraud, a problem that potentially dilutes the value of search engine traffic.
The non-profit professional association, which is working to increase awareness and promote the value of search engine marketing worldwide, presented additional findings about click fraud from its recent research paper, The State of Search Engine Marketing 2004.

"Search engine traffic is among the most valuable traffic to a web marketer due to the state of mind of a searcher. Click fraud, charging marketers for poor quality non-converting clicks, could poison the well," said Kevin Lee, a member of the SEMPO Board of Directors and Chair of the association's Research Committee. "During our recent research project, we got some great data on what marketers and agencies think about click fraud."

Marketers felt that organic SEO abuse or "search spam" was a bigger problem than click fraud. This is interesting given the high level of attention given to click fraud by the media. One explanation for the disparity between what marketers think and the media's heavy focus on the issue could be its potential impact on revenue from paid placement campaigns at publicly traded companies, such as Google, Yahoo, AskJeeves, InfoSpace, and FindWhat, among others.

When large marketers, smaller marketers and agencies were asked about click fraud, the results were enlightening: 10% of small advertisers thought click fraud was a significant problem that they had tracked, while none of the large advertisers agreed and 4% of agencies thought click fraud was a significant problem.

On average, across advertisers, 19% of advertisers believe that click fraud is a moderate problem and agencies agreed with 30% weighing in.

[ Comment, Edit or Article Submission ]